Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  57 / 84 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 57 / 84 Next Page
Page Background

F-2 | Child and Youth Protection and Safety

States may set different and even stricter standards

with regard to the age of a victim of child pornogra-

phy and what constitutes a violation of the civil law

and may also criminalize many other forms of mis-

conduct. International pastoral ministers will often

come from countries where the civil laws regarding

child pornography—and child abuse in general—

vary from those of the United States. Given this

fact, ministers should be trained in the relevant

ecclesiastical and civil law of the territorial area in

which they will serve.

Reporting of Allegations

The receipt and reporting of allegations of sex-

ual abuse of minors is another area that should

be addressed with international pastoral minis-

ters. The above referenced

Circular Letter

from the

Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, states:

“Sexual abuse of minors is not just a canonical delict

but also a crime prosecuted by civil law. Although

relations with civil authority will differ in various

countries, nevertheless it is important to cooperate

with such authority within their responsibilities.

Specifically, without prejudice to the sacramental

internal forum, the prescriptions of civil law regard-

ing the reporting of such crimes to the designated

authority should always be followed. This collabo-

ration, moreover, not only concerns cases of abuse

committed by clerics, but also those cases which

involve religious or lay persons who function in

ecclesiastical structures.”

Article 4 of the

Charter

, following on Article

11 of the

Essential Norms

, expresses succinctly the

strong commitment of the bishops of the United

States to promote cooperation with civil authori-

ties: “Dioceses/eparchies are to report an allegation

of sexual abuse of a person who is a minor to the

public authorities. Dioceses/eparchies are to com-

ply with all applicable civil laws with respect to the

reporting of allegations of sexual abuse of minors

to civil authorities and cooperate in their inves-

tigation in accord with the law of the jurisdiction

in question.”

In the United States, every state has enacted civil

laws that mandate reporting of child sexual abuse.

These laws vary from state to state concerning who

is a mandated reporter and what type of suspected

abuse or mistreatment must be reported. They also

differ concerning exemptions that might apply to

ministers who receive information or allegations in a

confidential forum. International pastoral ministers

should be well versed in the applicable civil law and

the means by which reporting requirements are ful-

filled. This is especially the case if their country of

origin does not mandate civil reporting of abuse.

The

Charter

also stipulates that cooperation with

public authorities should take place even if the per-

son alleged to have suffered sexual abuse is no longer

a minor. Moreover, victims of sexual abuse are to be

advised of their own right to make a report directly to

public authorities. If requested or necessary, church

ministers are to support this right in order to assure

that cooperation with authorities takes place.

Zero Tolerance

Another provision of the

Charter

and

Essential Norms

that deserves special attention is the so-called

zero

tolerance

provision for clerics who have offended.

Article 5 of the

Charter

reads: “Diocesan/eparchial

policy is to provide for even a single act of sexual

abuse of a minor—whenever it occurred—which is

admitted or established after an appropriate process

in accord with canon law, the offending priest or

deacon is to be permanently removed from ministry

and, if warranted, dismissed from the clerical state.”

This provision is also prescribed in Norm 8 of the

Essential Norms

.

The United States remains one of very few

countries in which its bishops have adopted a strin-

gent zero tolerance response to clerical sexual abuse

of minors. Accordingly, international clerics, includ-

ing those in institutes and societies, who come to the

United States may not be familiar with it or under-

stand its implications. They should be informed

clearly concerning what the policy of

zero tolerance

means, why it is important for child protection, and

how it applies to them. If they are found guilty of

or admit to acts of sexual abuse of minors they will

be permanently removed from public ministry in

this country.

It is also important for international clergy to

know that a diocesan or eparchial bishop may act to

withdraw a cleric from public ministry even in cases

where a canonical penalty has not been applied in

response to offensive acts. As Norm 9 of the

Essential

Norms

stipulates: “At all times, the diocesan bishop/

eparch has the executive power of governance,

within the parameters of the universal law of the

Church, through an administrative act, to remove

an offending cleric from office, to remove or restrict

his faculties, and to limit his exercise of priestly

ministry.” In this way, the

Essential Norms

recognize